Sunday, December 21, 2014

Acts of the Apostles Online Commentary (7)



This is the seventh entry in the Bible Junkies Online Commentary on the Acts of the Apostles. The first entry covered some of the major critical, technical and background issues that will concern us as we read through and comment on the Acts. The second post, found here, considered the prologue to the Acts of the Apostles. In the third column, we began to examine the founding of the Jerusalem Church. In the fourth blog post, the coming of the Holy Spirit at Pentecost and the beginning of Peter’s speech was discussed. In the fifth post, the bulk of Peter’s speech was examined. In the sixth entry, Peter’s speech concludes with a successful response according to Acts. The seventh blog post, listed below, deals with the formation of the apostles and other disciples into a community and the practices of the earliest community.

3. Contents:
B) Founding of the Jerusalem Church (1:12-2:47):  v) The Practice of the Early Church (2:42-47):
42 They devoted themselves to the apostles' teaching and fellowship, to the breaking of bread and the prayers. 43 Awe came upon everyone, because many wonders and signs were being done by the apostles. 44 All who believed were together and had all things in common; 45 they would sell their possessions and goods and distribute the proceeds to all, as any had need. 46 Day by day, as they spent much time together in the temple, they broke bread at home and ate their food with glad and generous hearts, 47 praising God and having the goodwill of all the people. And day by day the Lord added to their number those who were being saved. (NRSV)

What do these newly baptized followers of Jesus, along with the apostles and disciples who had followed Jesus prior to his death, do as a community? Luke offers a short précis of their practices, though it is not clear that all of the new disciples are included in all of these actions. Most scholars and translations place Acts 2:42 at the end of Peter’s speech, but I see it beginning the next section which outlines the practices of the community as a whole. Certainly, it is possible that the three thousand newly baptized are included in these practices, but it is not just them.

Acts 2:42 speaks of four things: devotion to the apostles' teaching (didachê), fellowship (koinonia), the breaking of bread, and prayers. The didachê must include teachings about Jesus himself, his life and death, what he himself taught, such as parables and prayers, and interpretation of the Jewish Scriptures in the context of who Jesus was understood to be by the apostles. It is not clear if koinonia is simply the “being together” of the baptized or if it implies more formal worship of the gathered community.

The breaking of bread is also difficult to determine, since it must imply eating together, but does it also imply a Eucharistic celebration? We know from Luke 24 that Jesus is described as breaking bread with the apostles, by which they see him in his resurrected state, but that act too might imply simply the act of the fellowship of a meal. It might be best to conclude that such breaking of the bread in Acts includes meals, but that the meals might also include the Eucharistic celebration, just as we see in 1 Corinthians 11. 

The prayers would include, it seems, the prayer(s) Jesus taught them, possibly extemporaneous Spirit-filled prayer, and also the prayers common to the Jews of the time.   

The next verse, Acts 2:43, describes the “awe” (phobos, literally “fear”) which came upon “everyone” (pasê psyche, literally “every soul”) because of the wonders (terata) and signs (sêmeia) done by the apostles. It does not outline what these wonders and signs are at this point, but Luke will begin describing some in the coming chapters. Luke, that is, wants to impress on readers that the power of the Holy Spirit, the same power operative in Jesus’ deeds, is now operative in the work and life of the apostles.
Luke then moves to a description of another aspect of the communal life of the apostles and disciples (“those who believed”): they “were together and had all things in common” (Acts 2:44). This communal lifestyle included a rejection of personal possessions (hyparxeis, “belongings”) and a distribution of goods to all who had need (Acts 2:45). The Jerusalem community, it seems, was putting into practice the rejection of goods and property which emerges from so many of Jesus’ parables which warn of the lure that wealth poses.

This community continued to see itself as a part of the life of Judaism, though followers of Jesus, since “day by day…they spent much time together in the temple, they broke bread at home and ate their food with glad and generous hearts, praising God and having the goodwill of all the people” (Acts 2:46-47a). The mention of “breaking bread” here with “and ate their food” does indicate that we were correct earlier to assume that this must indicate firstly the eating of community meals. The Temple remains a locus of worship, a place to pray and gather, and to bring (or attempt to bring) other Jews into the community. 

Luke again stresses, however, that their message was received and accepted by many people since he completes this section saying, “day by day the Lord added to their number those who were being saved” (Acts 2:47b). The same phrase that begins 2:46 ends 2:47, “day by day,” suggesting that the outreach had some success as often as attempted. These passages are important to indicate that the earliest community did find success among their Jewish brothers and sisters. Note, though, that Luke does not attribute success to the apostles as such, but to the Lord (kyrios). Jesus’ disciples are the means by which the message is brought, yet they are not the means by which salvation comes.
Next entry, Peter and John in Jerusalem.

John W. Martens
I invite you to follow me on Twitter @Biblejunkies
I encourage you to “Like” Biblejunkies on Facebook.
This entry is cross-posted at America Magazine The Good Word

Wednesday, December 17, 2014

Celebrate Hanukkah with Dr. Dreidel

Dr. Dreidel/ Hannah Rothstein
At a recent party I played the dreidel game for the first time in years.  It had been so long that I had forgotten the rules.  A friend with whom I was playing sent me a link to the work of artist Hannah Rothstein, who created the Dr. Dreidel.  

With Hanukkah already started, there probably isn't time to get your own Dr. Dreidel, although ordinary dreidels and chocolate coins can be found everywhere this time of year. 

Adapted from Myjewishlearning.com, here are the game's rules:
  • Each player (as many as you want) begins with the same number of game pieces (chocolate coins, M&M's, etc)
  • Each player antes up at the beginning of each round.
  • Each player spins the dreidel; depending on the spin, you give or get from the pot. 
  • Nun means "nisht" or "nothing;" The player gets nothing
  • Gimmel means "gantz" or "everything;" The player gets everything
  • Hey means "halb" or "half;"The player gets half of the pot.
  • Shin means "shtel" or "put in;" The player adds a piece 
  • If you end up with nothing, you are out unless a friend loans pieces to you
  • When one person has won everything, that round of the game is over!


Isaac M. Alderman
Follow me on Twitter @isaacaldermanFeel free to“Like” Biblejunkies on Facebook 
Follow Bible Junkies on Twitter @Biblejunkies







Tuesday, December 9, 2014

PBC's New Document: The Inspiration and Truth of Sacred Scripture

This summer the Pontifical Biblical Commission (PBC) published a new document on the inspiration and truth of Sacred Scripture. I waited eagerly for the English version which I finally received last week and read it that same evening. I will probably have a few comments on this new document, but for now it seems very appropriate to present it to you with the words of Fr. Klemens Stock, SJ, the PBC’s exiting secretary. This presentation is not part of the PBC's document, but it was written for the bulletin of the Pontifical Biblical Institute. What follows is my translation from the original Italian.[1]

The text is organized in three parts: Inspiration, Truth and some challenges for the interpretation of the Bible. The starting point of this survey is the teaching of the dogmatic constitution Dei Verbum from the Second Vatican Council. The document seeks to show how the same biblical texts bear witness about their own inspiration and truth, while considering necessary to limit the study to a representative selection of these writings.

Given that only two passages (2 Tim 3:16; 2 Pet 1:20-21) talk explicitly about divine inspiration, the research guiding question is: What do these texts say about their divine provenance and the relationship of their authors with God? The Old Testament attests, for example, Moses and the prophets’ calling and the fact that they receive from God the instructions they must communicate, both orally and in writing to the people (Exod 24:4; 34:27; Deut 31:9). In the New Testament the relationship of the authors with God occurs always, whether immediate or mediate, through the person of Jesus. Paul affirms his encounter with the risen Jesus (1 Cor 9:1; 15:7) and considers it a gift (grace) from the Father (Gal 1:15-16). The author of the fourth Gospel attests his own contemplation of the Only Son’s glory (John 1:14) and presents himself as an eyewitness (John 19:35; 21:24), instructed and guided by the Spirit of truth, who is sent by the glorified Jesus (John 15:26; 16:13). However, the relationship of the author of the Gospel of Luke and with the author of the Letter to the Hebrews is mediated. The first one is based on the “eyewitnesses and servants of the word” (Luke 1:2); the second one on the witnesses who heard the announcement of the Lord (Heb 2:3). The biblical writings show in many ways the relationship of their authors with God (OT) through Jesus (NT), but they do not mention a particular divine assistance benefited by the authors while in writing (inspiration in the strict sense).

The truth that is at the center of the divine revelation concerns God himself and human salvation and is revealed in its fullness in Christ (DV 2, 11). Sacred Scripture is not interested in any subject but in communicating this truth. The reading which corresponds to the finality of Sacred Scripture is the one which looks in itself the knowledge of God and of his salvation. This fullness of truth cannot be found in a restricted reading of single and isolated writings, but only in a “canonical” reading in the light that is the person of Jesus. The document presents, through a selection of passages in both Testaments, the truth that they manifest. Based on Matt 28:18-20, the culmination of the revelation of the truth about God and his salvation may be expressed as: Jesus reveals God who is Father, Son and Holy Spirit, who is the fullness of communion of life in himself, and who offers as salvation to humanity the sharing in his communion of life.

Fr. Klemens Stock, SJ 
As way of example, the document deals with some biblical passages that appear problematic from either a historical, ethic or social point of view. Regarding if it actually happened, from the OT, the covenant with Abraham (Gen 15), the crossing of the sea (Exod 14), the books of Tobit and Jonah, and from the NT, the infancy narratives, Jesus’ miracles and the resurrection narratives are taken into account in the document.  The vow to the extermination of the inhabitants of the land of Canaan (cf. Deut 7:1-2; Josh 6-12), the prayer to God asking for vengeance (cf. Ps 109) that appear as practices totally opposed to Jesus’ teaching are considered here too. Also presented as problematic is the social disposition (statute) concerning women described in some NT texts (Col 3:18; Eph 5:22-23; Titus 2:5). For the consideration of these biblical passages we refer you to the document. 

Later on I hope to come back with a review of this PBC’s document.

Juan Miguel Betancourt

Follow me on Twitter @betancourt_jm
Follow Bible Junkies on Twitter @Biblejunkies
Feel free to“Like” Biblejunkies on Facebook.





[1] From Vinea Electa. Bolletino informativo dell’Associazione ex-alunni/e del Pontificio Istituto Biblico, num. 14, anno 2014, 22-23.